SHER SINGH URF SHERU S/O SHRI ROHITASH MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1094/2025 · 2025-08-14
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27507 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27507 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31745-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1094/2025 Sher Singh @ Sheru S/o Shri Rohitash Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Dantil, Police Station Pragpura, At Present R/o Ward No. 3, Adarsh Nagar, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present In Open Air Camp Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Prisoners Parole Advisory Committee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan.
3. Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. G.A. & Ms. Neha Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order 14/08/2025
1. This petition is filed seeking regular parole.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted the application for release on permanent parole before the appropriate authority. However, his application has yet not been decided and is still pending. Therefore, counsel for the petitioner has made a limited prayer to direct the appropriate authority to decide the application of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.
[2025:RJ-JP:31745-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1094/2025]
3. This petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction that the application of the petitioner for permanent parole shall be decided within three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law if aggrieved of the decision.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DANISH USMANI /14