- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1187 RFA No. 1406 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1406 OF 2023 (MON) BETWEEN: SHRI. A.BABU, S/O AUGUSTIN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.235, 2ND CROSS, RAGAVENDRA LAYOUT, PILLAIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, BHANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 083. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABHISHEK.N.N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SHRI. K.M.THAMBI DORAI AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O MARGABHANDHU, RESIDING AT: NO.46, 3RD CROSS, KODICHIKANAHALLI ROAD, NANJAPPA LAYOUT, VIJAYA BANK COLONY, BILEKHALLI, BENGALURU-560 072. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER LXI RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1187 RFA No. 1406 of 2023 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the fifth time. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and also before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5