APHC010389472015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the sixteenth Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi WRIT PETITION No. 11830 of Between: A.Satya Rao And State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the petitioner: 1. Y.Sudhakar Counsel for the respondent 1. Government Pleader for 2. Sri P.Ponna Rao (Deputy The Court made the following The writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India following relief: “…to issue any appropriate in the nature of mandamus declaring the order passed by the 3rd respondent in proceedings Rc cancelling the permission accorded by the 1 of vertical band saw to the petitioner saw mill as illegal violative of Article 14 and 19 consequently set aside the order passed by the 3 proceedings Rc.No.2344/1994/S3 dated 21 justice and pass such order IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the sixteenth Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi WRIT PETITION No. 11830 of 2015 ...Petitioner f Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: espondents overnment Pleader for Forests (A.P) eputy Solicitor General of India) made the following order: etition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue any appropriate writ order or direction preferably a andamus declaring the order passed by the 3rd roceedings Rc.No.2344/1994 / S3 dated 21 cancelling the permission accorded by the 1st respondent for installation ertical band saw to the petitioner saw mill as illegal, arbitrary an violative of Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the order passed by the 3rd respondent in 2344/1994/S3 dated 21.1.2015 in the interest of such order or orders…..” IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Wednesday, the sixteenth Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five ...Petitioner ...Respondents filed for the irection preferably a writ andamus declaring the order passed by the 3rd S3 dated 21.01.2015 respondent for installation arbitrary and onstitution of India and respondent in 2015 in the interest of 2 BSB,J W.P.No.11830 of 2015 2. Sri P.A.N.V.Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 16.07.2025 GRL 3 BSB,J W.P.No.11830 of 2015 137 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI W.P. No. 11830 of 2015 Date: 16.07.2025 GRL