Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27488 (ORI)

MAHADEB MEHER v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/4052/2025 · 2025-09-04

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.4052 of 2025 Mahadeb Meher and another … Petitioners Mr. U.K. Panda, proxy counsel on behalf of Mr. G. Sahu, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. T.K. Acharya, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 04.09.2025 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Sinapali PS Case No.66 of 2025 corresponding to CT Case No.66 of 2025 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Sinapali, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.274/275/112(1) of BNS r/w Sections 52(a)(i)/ 55(b)/62(i) of Odisha Excise Act, on the allegation of possessing 130ltrs 950ml of foreign liquor. 3. Heard, Mr. Udipta Kumar Panda, learned proxy counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Gokulananda Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. T.K. Acharya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of p. 2 the offences as alleged against the petitioners vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioners in custody since 15.03.2025 with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioners to bail. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioners stands allowed and the petitioners are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. 7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. (G. Satapathy) Judge Subhasmita Designation: Jr. Stenographer