JASPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. PUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER
CWP/4700/2025 · 2025-05-28
Deepinder Singh Nalwa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27486 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27486 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-4700 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 253 CWP-4700 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:28.05.2025 Jaspal Singh and another
....Petitioners Versus Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (PUNSUP) and another .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Standing Counsel for the respondent-FCI. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA
, J. (Oral)
1. In the present writ petition, the petitioners are praying for quashing of Instructions dated 26.10.2004 (Annexure P-3) as well as quashing of order dated 16.01.2025 (Annexure P-4) whereby, punishment of recovery has been imposed upon the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is duly covered by the judgment passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case titled as Punjab State DINESH 2025.05.31 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-4700 of 2025 (O&M) 2 Warehousing Corporation Field Employees Union versus Union of India and others
, CWP No.27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided
on 14.05.2025. However, he submits that a perusal of the aforesaid order would reflect that the liberty has been granted to the petitioners therein, to submit the representation, which will be considered by the concerned authority in terms of the order passed by the Court. He further submits that the present petition may be treated as a representation and the respondents be
directed to consider the same in light of the order passed in CWP No.27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in CWP-27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025.
4. The respondents are directed to treat the present writ petition as a representation and take a decision in terms of the judgment passed by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-27725 of 2013 and other connected petitions, decided on 14.05.2025
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA)
JUDGE May 28, 2025
dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.05.31 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document