[2025:RJ-JP:24862] 1HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19841/2023 Omprakash Meena S/o Late Mangal Chand Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Mahapura, Tehsil Choth Ka Barwara, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Primary) Education, Bikaner. 4. The Director (Secondary) Education, Bikaner. 5. The District Collector, Sawaimadhopur. 6. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sawaimadhopur. 7. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Sawaimadhopur. 8. The Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Choth Ka Barwara, District Sawaimadhopur. 9. The Paden Panchayat Elementary Education Officer (Peeo), Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Mahapura, Choth Ka Barwara, District Sawaimadhopur. 10. The Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Mahapura, Panchayat Samiti Choth Ka Barwara, District Sawaimadhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 07/07/2025 1. Heard counsel for petitioner and perused the record. 2. Petitioner preferred instant writ petition on 21.08.2023, seeking direction against the respondents to allow him to join on the post of Vidhyalaya Sahayak at Government Senior Secondary [2025:RJ-JP:24862] (2 of 2) [CW-19841/2023] School, Mahapura, Panchayat Samiti Choth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur, pursuant to his appointment order dated 08.12.2022(Annx.05). 2. A perusal of the appointment order dated 08.12.2022, clearly reveals that the petitioner was directed to join on or before 20.12.2022. The reason of family adversarial circumstances, assigned by the petitioner for not joining during this period, is not convincing to this Court, moreso, when the petitioner has approached before this Court after a long lapse of period i.e. in the month of August, 2023. There is no reason to file the writ petition with such a delay in respect of the issue involved in the writ petition regarding not joining, pursuant to the appointment order. 3. Counsel for petitioner, after arguing the writ petition and having instructions from the petitioner, does not want to pursue the writ petition on merits and seeks liberty to submit a Representation, to be considered by the respondents. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press. 5. It is needless to observe that petitioner is always at liberty to submit a Representation before the respondents to allow him to join, if the vacant post is still available. 6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/20