- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2445 WP No. 13964 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13964 OF 2020 (GM-KSSIDC) BETWEEN: 1. ZAKEER HUSSAIN PROPRIETOR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, M/S V.S.AUTOMATION, A-25/1, HMT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, JALAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 015. 2. M.V.WASEEM AHMED PROPRIETOR, M/S ZINAB TRADING, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, A-26 HMT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, JALAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 015. 3. M.V.NASEER HUSSAIN PROPRIETOR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, M/S Z.N.ENTERPRISES, JALAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 015. 4. SMT S.V.LAVANYA PROPRIETRIX, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, M/S SRI SAI ENTERPRISES, 9TH CROSS, KANAKA BHAVAN, KALLURAHALLI ROAD, HOSKOTE TOWN, BENGALURU DISTRICT-562 114. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.KALYAN BASAVARAJ., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2445 WP No. 13964 of 2020 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE KARNATAKA SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, RAJAJINAGAR INDUSTRIAL TOWN, BENGALURU-560 055. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1; SRI. HARISH KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.NARASI REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.1 and Sri.Harish Kumar., counsel on behalf of Sri.G.Narasi Reddy., for respondent No.2 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation dated 15.10.2020 vide Annexure-D seeking - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2445 WP No. 13964 of 2020 extension of time to apply for sheds/ sites in so far as it relates to sheds/ sites in Hoskote bearing Nos.A-67, A-68, A-69, B-55, B-56, B-57, B-58, B-59, SM-49 at Kanakapura II Stage. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The petitioners grievance is that they have made a representation to the second respondent in the year 2020 i.e., on 15.10.2020 and the same has not been considered as of today. Hence, a Mandamus is ordered directing the second respondent to consider the representation dated 15.10.2020 submitted by the petitioners vide Annexure-D in accordance with the law if not considered as of today, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 40