At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to Magistrate, Gohana the petitioner to by respondent No. No.4 for grant of parole as the months. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to Magistrate, Gohana to finally dispose of the representation submitted on behal to the Jail Authorities, District Jail, respondent No.3 on 17.10.2025 vide dispatch No. for grant of parole as the same has been pending decision for nearly 03 Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the , we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4-District to finally dispose of the representation submitted on behalf of Jail, Karnal, which was dispatched vide dispatch No.15554-57 to respondent me has been pending decision for nearly 03 Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the , we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he District f of which was dispatched to respondent me has been pending decision for nearly 03 Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the , we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind JYOTI THAKUR 2026.01.15 08:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022. 4. In the light direction to respondent No.4 dated 17.10.2025 within two weeks from the date of rece with law. Jyoti Thakur Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition wit direction to respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the 17.10.2025 submitted on behalf of the petitioner for the grant of parole within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, of the above, we dispose of the instant petition wit to take a final decision on the petitioner’s request submitted on behalf of the petitioner for the grant of parole ipt of a copy of this order, in accordance Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a petitioner’s request submitted on behalf of the petitioner for the grant of parole ipt of a copy of this order, in accordance JYOTI THAKUR 2026.01.15 08:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document