SYED KARIMULLA SHA KHADRI v. NALAM BHARATH RAMADEVI
AS/803/2019 · 2025-04-21
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27465 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.803 OF 2019)
APHC010389722019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 803/2019 Between: Syed Karimulla Sha Khadri and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Nalam Bharath Ramadevi and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. SUDHESHNA YAKKALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This appeal has been filed by the appellants/plaintiffs, being aggrieved from the dismissal of their suit filed for cancellation of sale deed dated 12.12.2012 vide Document No.10324 of 2012 in respect of the suit schedule property, by judgment and decree dated 18.09.2019 passed in O.S.No.245 of 2015 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Nellore.
2 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.803 OF 2019)
2. The appellants submitted a letter dated 06.03.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, requesting for withdrawal of the present appeal.
3. The matter has been listed under the caption “for withdrawal”.
4. Smt. Sudhehna Yakkala, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that although paragraph No.3 of the letter mentions allowing the applicant to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh one, the appellants are not pressing for such liberty. She further submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Sri A.Sreeram, learned counsel representing Sri Harinath Reddy Soma, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Date : 21.04.2025. RPD.
3 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.803 OF 2019)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
(DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN)
APPEAL SUIT NO: 803 OF 2019
Date: 21.04.2025
RPD.