RAMCHANDRA SON OF SHRI KANHAIYA LAL v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CW/13415/2025 · 2025-09-08
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27460 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27460 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35889] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13415/2025
1. Ramchandra Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
2. Laxminarayan Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Through Secretary, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Raj.
2. Mojika Real Estate And Developers Pvt. Ltd., Through Director, Durga Prasad Agrawal, Address Mojika Dream Point, 401-405, Janana Hospital Ke Samne, Subhash Nagar, Jaipur.
3. Bhairulal Son Of Son Of Shri Kanhaiyalal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
4. Ramesh Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
5. Prabhu Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
6. Krishn Kumar Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
7. Gulab Devi Yadav Son Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur.
8. Mamta Devi Yadav Daughter Of Late Shri Bhori Lal, Resident Of Chak Salagrampura, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 08/09/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:35889] (2 of 2) [CW-13415/2025]
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are aggrieved of the order dated 10.01.2025 whereby, learned Tribunal has dismissed the petition stating withdrawal by all the parties. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there were total 8 persons including the petitioners and the application for withdrawal was filed by a few persons and not all, despite this learned Tribunal has dismissed the petition stating withdrawn by all the parties.
2. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that the said grievance can be raised before appropriate forum by filing an appropriate application, instead of approaching the writ jurisdiction, thus, this Court deems it apposite not to interfere in the instant matter.
3. Howsoever, petitioners are at liberty to file appropriate application i.e., recall/rectification/mistake/review before the concerned Tribunal, who shall consider the same as per facts and pass appropriate orders, within a period of two weeks.
4. Accordingly, the instant matter stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/9