Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010390162018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 907/2018 Between: Mr.korada Ramesh Naidu and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Mr Pathivada Krishna and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. KURITI BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 907/2018 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
This appeal has been filed being aggrieved from the dismissal of the suit for specific performance of contract.
2. On 14.10.2024, the following order was passed:
“Learned counsel for the appellants is not available.
List the appeal under the caption “For Hearing” on 28.10.2024.”
3. Today there is no representation for the appellants.
4. Sri G.Rama Gopal, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
5. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for default.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J
Dated:03.04.2025 AG
136 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
APPEAL SUIT NO: 907/2018
Dated:03.04.2025 AG