SMT. DALI BAI WIFE OF LATE SHRI DEVILAL @ DEVLAL RAIGAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5130/2025 · 2025-08-21
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27454 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27454 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33173] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5130/2025 Smt. Dali Bai Wife Of Late Shri Devilal @ Devlal Raigar, aged about 62 Years, Resident of House No. 119, Rang Vihar Road, Mahaveer Nagar- Third, Kota, Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, Kota, District Kota (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Ranglal Son of Hazarilal, Resident of Polyada, Police Station Dooni, District Tonk (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Agarwal for Mr. V.S. Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 21/08/2025
1. Petitioner-complainant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking for expeditious investigation in the FIR No. 108/2023 for offence under Sections 420 and 120B of IPC registered at Police Station Kunhadi, in furtherance to the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.1 (South), Kota for further investigation.
2. It has been submitted that the Police has submitted negative final report in the FIR whereagainst the petitioner filed a protest petition. On the protest petition, Judicial Magistrate directed further investigation vide order dated 13.12.2024, however, in pursuance thereof, the investigation has not been concluded so far.
[2025:RJ-JP:33173] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5130/2025]
3. It appears from the record that petitioner filed an application before the Judicial Magistrate, praying to call for the progress report of investigation.
4. In pursuance thereof, progress reports of investigation dated 12.02.2025, 28.03.2025 and lastly 19.04.2025 were produced by the Police. These progress reports are available on record.
5. In this view of the matter, this Court finds that the Judicial Magistrate is seized with the matter and petitioner has remedy to seek orders in respect of expeditious re-investigation from the Court of Judicial Magistrate itself.
6. It is hereby observed that in case, any such prayer is made by the petitioner before the Judicial Magistrate, he may pass appropriate orders to ensure the expeditious investigation in furtherance to the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by Judicial Magistrate No.1 (South), Kota.
7. With aforesaid observations, instant petition stands disposed of.
8. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /57