AMRAWATI JAISWAL AND 17 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WTAX/840/2025 · 2025-03-09
Piyush Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27454 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27454 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34707
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 840 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amrawati Jaiswal And 17 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Singh,Shailendra Kumar,Sheo Kinkar Singh,Suryaprakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned ACSC for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarify that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse the remedy available under the law.
Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad