Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27447 (MAD)

P.V.Venkatesan v. P.V.Indirani Ammal

CS/660/2015 · 2025-02-18

A A Nakkiran

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.S.No.660 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.02.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.S.No.660 of 2015 and A.No.3261 of 2023 1.P.V.Venkatesan 2.P.V.Sairam 3.M.Kesavel 4.N.Srinivasan .. Plaintiffs Vs. 1.P.V.Indirani Ammal 2.P.V.Sayammal 3.P.V.Radhabai 4.P.V.Raja Mannar 5.S.Vimala Krishnan 6.T.V.Vijayalakshmi 7.R.Varun Kumar 8."P.Veeraraghavalu Chetty Private Family Charitable Religious and Educational Trust" Rep. by Managing Trustee 27, Sengalaneer Pillaiyar Koil Street Now called New Street George Town, Chennai-600 001. 9.T.V.Rangarajan (9th defendant was impleaded as per order dated 21.12.2011 in Apln. No. 8601 of 2017) .. Defendants 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.660 of 2015 Prayer: Civil Suit filed under 92 CPC and Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code r/w Order IV Rule 1 of High Court O.S Rules, praying to pass a judgement and decree; a) that a scheme may be framed for the proper management and administration of the properties and charities of "P.Veeraraghavalu Chetty Private Family Charitable, Religious and Educational Trust" the 8th defendant by the appointment of Trustees from among the descendants of the deceased P.Veeraraghavalu Chety excepting the 4th defendant, for such administration and conduct of charities b) for removal of the 4th defendant from the Managing Trusteeship and the possession of the properties, with a direction to him to deliver possession of all the trust properties to the successor appointed in his place c) direction be issued to the 4th defendant to account for the income, rents and profits of the properties described in Schedules A to C from 15.07.2012 till date and directing the 4th defendant to furnish security for the sum of Rs.6,00,000/- in cash or by way of immovable property. d) appointing any other trustee as the Managing trustee of the 8th defendant. e) appointing any other descendant or descendants of late P.Veeraraghavalu Chetty as another trustee or trustees, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.660 of 2015 eligible to become Managing Trustee of the 8th defendant. f) to authorize and / or direct the sale of any or all of the agricultural lands and utilize the funds for construction of Marriage halls in Chennai and start and run a Primary school in the name of the founder of the 8th defendant Trust. g) for costs. For Plaintiffs : No Appearance For Defendants : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar for D4 Mrs.S.Shyamala for D7 Mr.S.N.Ravichandran for D8 JUDGMENT When the matter came up for hearing on 05.02.2025, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the plaintiffs in the cause list and directed the plaintiffs to appear before this Court on 17.02.2025. Again, when the matter came up for hearing on 17.02.2025, the plaintiffs did not appear before this Court and the learned counsel for the plaintiffs submitted that he has given change of vakalat before the Registry. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to remove the name of the counsel for the plaintiffs and post the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.660 of 2015 A.A.NAKKIRAN,J. uma 18.02.2025. Even today (18.02.2025), the plaintiffs did not appear before this Court. Hence, the Civil Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected application is closed. 18.02.2024 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking Order uma C.S.No.660 of 2015 and A.No.3261 of 2023 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis