Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27447 (DEL)

VIJAY GUPTA v. RBI OMBUDSMAN & ANR.

W.P.(C)/12330/2024 · 2025-01-09

Manoj Jain

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 12330/2024 1 $~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12330/2024, CM APPL. 71349/2024 & CM APPL. 71350/2024 VIJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. Versus RBI OMBUDSMAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma with Mr. Dipan Sethi and Mr. Snehashish, Advocates for respondent No.1. Mr. Sumit Geol with Ms. Sreeparna Basak and Ms. Apurba Pattanayak, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 09.01.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No.1/RBI Ombudsman submits that Ombudsman shall consider the representation of the petitioner afresh without getting influenced by its earlier decision. He also states that if Ombudsman thinks it appropriate, it would also see whether opportunity of any personal hearing is required to be given to the petitioner or not. 2. Petitioner, who appears in person, submits that in view of the above, he does not press the present petition. He, however, states that the above said exercise may be made time-bound. He also seeks liberty This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:43:20 W.P.(C) 12330/2024 2 to revive the proceedings in case the result still remains the same. 3. In view of the above and after taking inputs from learned counsel for the respondent No.1/RBI Ombudsman, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed. Simultaneously, the Ombudsman is requested to consider the representation afresh within a period of four weeks from today. 4. Needless to say, in case the Ombudsman feels any requirement of giving any personal hearing to the petitioner, it would afford such opportunity to the petitioner. 5. The petition is disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 6. Copy of this order be also given Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. MANOJ JAIN, J JANUARY 9, 2025 st This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:43:20