[2025:RJ-JP:34427] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9915/2025 Chhajuram S/o Ramkishan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Village Dumoli Khurd, P.S. Singhana, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu At Present Rental Home No. 61, Chhatrasal Nagar, Jagatpura, P.S. Jawahar Circle, Jaipur, At Present Costumer Relationship Executive, Shop No. 10-11, Vodafone Store, Kishan Market Malpura Road, Sanganer, Jaipur (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10256/2025 Ghanshyam Meena S/o Shaitan Singh Meena, R/o Shri Govindpura, Post Vanasthali Vidhyapeeth, Gram Panchayat Bidoli, P.S. Nivai Tehsil Nivai, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10257/2025 Abhishek Rajput S/o Vinod, R/o House No. 143, Block- A, Durga Vihar, Devli Pushpa Bhawan, Police Station Nebsaray, South Delhi, Presently Tenant House No. 512, Rajputon Ka Mohallan, Durgapura, Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur, Presently Customer Relationship Executive And Cashier Shop No. 10-11, Vodhaphone Store, Kishan Market, Malpura Road, Sanganer, Jaipur. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent [2025:RJ-JP:34427] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9915/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satya Pal Poshwal, Adv., with Ms. Abhilasha Choudhary, Adv., Mr. Anupam Sharma, Adv., with Mr. Harshit Parashar, Adv., and Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/08/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.06/2025 registered at Cyber Police Station (ATS & SOG), District ATS & SOG for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3) & 340(2) of BNS, 2023, Sections 43, 66(C) & 66(D) of IT Act, 2000 and Section 42(3) of Telecommunication Act, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. They argue that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. They contend that the petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. [2025:RJ-JP:34427] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9915/2025] 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Chhajuram S/o Ramkishan, 2. Ghanshyam Meena S/o Shaitan Singh Meena and 3. Abhishek Rajput S/o Vinod shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made herein above is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/165-167