MOHINDER KAUR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HER LRS v. SANT LAL AND ANOTHER
CR/1589/2023 · 2025-08-28
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27445 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27445 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
131
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT MOHINDER KAUR SINCE
SANT LAL AND ANOTHER
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr. Ravinder Banger, Advocate with Ms. Anjali Bangar,
Mr. Rajinder Singh Rana,
HARKESH MANUJA Present 16.12.2022 passed by whereby, eviction order dated Controller, Kurukshetra Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction), Act 1973
2. After arguing for some respondents on instr the petition on merit but the to make arrangement of alternative accommodation. 3. Accordingly, i their respective coun petitioner-landlady shall not claim arrears of rent due w.e.f 01.01.2023 till 31.10.2025. 4. In view of the above, respondents-tenants over the vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises under their occupation to the also abide by the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:
MOHINDER KAUR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HER LRS
Versus SANT LAL AND ANOTHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ravinder Banger, Advocate with Ms. Anjali Bangar, Advocate for the Mr. Rajinder Singh Rana, Advocate for **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Present revision petition is directed against the passed by the learned Appellate Authority whereby, eviction order dated 03.02.2017 Kurukshetra in exercise of powers under Section 13 of Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction), Act 1973 After arguing for some time, on instructions states that he does not the petition on merit but the respondents may be given to make arrangement of alternative accommodation. Accordingly, it has been agreed between the parties through their respective counsel representing them before this Court that landlady shall not claim arrears of rent due w.e.f 01.01.2023 till 31.10.2025. In view of the above, learned counsel representing tenants undertakes that the respondents over the vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises under occupation to the petitioner-landlady on or before also abide by the following:-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1589-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 28, 2025
DECEASED THROUGH HER LRS ......Petitioner
......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ravinder Banger, Advocate with Advocate for the petitioner. Advocate for respondent No.1. petition is directed against the Order dated the learned Appellate Authority, Kurukshetra passed by the learned Rent in exercise of powers under Section 13 of The Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction), Act 1973 was set aside. time, learned counsel for the that he does not intend to contest may be given reasonable time to make arrangement of alternative accommodation.
t has been agreed between the parties through sel representing them before this Court that landlady shall not claim arrears of rent due w.e.f 01.01.2023
learned counsel representing respondents-tenant, shall hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises under on or before 31.10.2025 and shall (O&M) , 2025
dated Kurukshetra passed by the learned Rent The counsel for the contest reasonable time t has been agreed between the parties through sel representing them before this Court that landlady shall not claim arrears of rent due w.e.f 01.01.2023
learned counsel representing hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises under and shall TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.09.03 04:08 I agree to specified portions of this document
CR-1589-2023 (O&M)
-2-
(a)
The respondents-tenant shall not cause any damage to the property, create any encumbrance, or transfer possession, in any manner, of the demised premises.
(b)
The respondents-tenant shall continue to use and occupy the property and enjoy the same strictly in terms of the municipal by-laws. No further construction, more so unauthorized in nature, shall be carried out by them. (c)
Before handing over the possession of the demised premises, the respondents-tenant shall clear all statutory dues. (d)
In the event the respondents violating any of these terms, it shall be open to the landlord(s) to initiate the proceedings for obtaining possession in terms of the order of ejectment and also initiate proceedings for contempt, if so advised. (e)
All pending litigation(s), if any, inter se the parties in relation to the demised premises shall stand closed. (f)
The tenant shall file an undertaking before this Court agreeing to the aforesaid terms, within a period of two weeks from today.
5.
It is made clear that any rent deposited by respondents- tenant either before the learned Rent Controller or before the Executing Court up to 31.12.2022 be released in favour of the petitioner-landlady.
6.
Failure of the respondents to comply with either of the conditions would entitle the petitioner/landlady to execute the eviction
order forthwith. In case the petitioner does not vacate the premises on or before 31.10.2025, he shall be liable to pay Rs.5000/- per day as agreed towards mesne profit to the petitioner-landlady.
7.
In view of the agreed stand taken by the parties, the decision dated 16.12.2022 passed by learned Appellate Authority is hereby set aside, resultantly, the eviction petition preferred at the instance of petitioner-landlady is accepted.
8.
Order accordingly.
9.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
28.08.2025
(HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder
JUDGE TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.09.03 04:08 I agree to specified portions of this document