- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5462 WP No. 13189 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13189 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. LOKESH T.N. S/O NAGARAJU T.C.., AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO. OLD STREET, WARD NO.06, TALAKADU POST, MYSORE DISTRICT-571 122. 2. RAJU.T.S. S/O LATE T.V.SHIVARUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. OLD STREET, WARD NO.06 TALAKADU POST, MYSORE DISTRICT-571 122. 3. SUNANDA C/O RAJESH.T.S., AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, TALAKADU VILLAGE, T.NARASIPURA TALUKU, MYSORE-571 122. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUMARA.K.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5462 WP No. 13189 of 2020 2. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE-570 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MYSORE-570 001. 4. THE THASHILDAR, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, T.NARASIPURA-571 124. 5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, T.NARASIPURA TALUK-571 124. 6. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYATH, T.NARASIPURA TALUK-571 124. 7. THE SECRETARY, TALAKADU GRAM PANCHAYATH, T.NARASIPURA TALUK-571 124. 8. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TALAKADU GRAM PANCHAYATH, T.NARASIPURA TALUK-571 124. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1 TO 4; R5-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5462 WP No. 13189 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Sri.Kumara.K.G., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 37