WA No. 1007 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR WA No. 1007 of 2025 P.Vadivel Appellant(s) Vs 1.The District Collector Office of the District Collector Coimbatore, State Bank Road, Coimbatore District-641018. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Coimbatore South, State Bank Road, Coimbatore District-641018. 3.The Thasildhar Madukarai Taluk, Madukarai Coimbatore-641105 Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1007 of 2025 WA No. 1007 of 2025 PRAYER To set aside the order passed in WP No.3201/2025 dated 03.02.2025 WA No. 1007 of 2025 For Appellant(s): Mr.C.D.Sugumar For Respondent(s): Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan AGP JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Coimbatore South, issued under Section 107 of the Civil Procedure Code for conducting an enquiry was under challenge in the writ proceedings before the learned single Judge. The learned Single Judge declined to entertain the writ petition and thus, the present writ appeal. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that Section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code proceedings initiated must be completed within a time limit. The notice issued under Section 107 proceedings would not provide a cause for institution of the writ proceedings. A person received such notice is expected to participate in the enquiry and submit his explanation / https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1007 of 2025 defence before the Executive Magistrate concerned. The procedures contemplated under Section 107 is of paramount importance for the purpose of maintaining peace and tranquillity in a particular locality. 3. Therefore, Courts cannot fix a time limit, since it is the procedure to be followed based on the field situation prevails and the Executive Magistrate will be the best person to take a decision. Therefore, this Court do not find any reason to interfere with the writ order impugned and consequently the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. 4. The observations made by the learned Single Judge in the writ order impugned is obiter dicta and not a precedent. Therefore, the enquiry must be conducted independently and in accordance with law. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) (K.RAJASEKAR J.) 04-04-2025 Jeni Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1007 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.RAJASEKAR J. Jeni To 1.The District Collector Office of the District Collector Coimbatore State Bank Road, Coimbatore District-641018 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Coimbatore South, State Bank Road, Coimbatore District-641018 3.The Thasildhar Madukarai Taluk, Madukarai Coimbatore-641105 WA No. 1007 of 2025 04.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1007 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1007 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis