Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27438 (CAL)

KAMAL MAHATO v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

WPA/10575/2010 · 2025-03-25

Rai Chattopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2 09.07.2024 09.07.2024 Ct. No. 18 adeb W.P.A. 10575 of 2010 IA No. CAN 1/2017 ( Old No. CAN 3304/2017) Sri Kamal Mahato Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Supriyo Chattopadhyay Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal …for the State Ms. Tapati Sarkar …for the respondent no. 9 At the time of call no one appears for the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for. However, State-respondents and Paschim Banga Rajya Sishu Siksha Mission are represented by learned advocates. Same situation prevailed on 2nd July, 2024. It appears petitioner has lost interest. The writ petition stands dismissed. Application, if any pending, also stands dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)