Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27434 (BOM)

MUMTAJ RASHID SHAIKH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/10772/2025 · 2025-10-06

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25 WP NO. 10772 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10772 OF 2025 Mumtaj Rashid Shaikh VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others … • Mr. I. K. Wagh, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. A. R. Kale, Addl.GP for Respondents/State • Mr. A. R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 … CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATED : OCTOBER 06, 2025 PER COURT : 1. We have heard the matter at length. 2. The learned AGP as well as the learned advocate for respondent No. 2 point out that there is a provision to challenge the impugned order/orders, i.e. in respect of the cancellation of the residence certificates as well as cancellation of appointment of the petitioner. Necessary circulars and notifications have been placed on record to demonstrate the availability of an alternate forum providing appellate jurisdiction. Jhs/ 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:28133-DB 25 WP NO. 10772 OF 2025 3. In view of our disinclination to grant any relief, learned advocate for the petitioner, upon seeking instructions from the petitioner, who is stated to be present before the Court, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition to approach the alternate forum. 4. In light of the above, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the alternate forum as prayed. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) Jhs/ 2/2