Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27432 (PNJ)

SANDEEP v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/9645/2025 · 2025-04-21

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9645-2025 Date of Decision:21.04.2025 Sandeep …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Pardeep Chhokar, Advocate for the complainant. ***** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.166, dated 19.04.2024, under Sections 406,420 and 120-B of IPC, registered at Police Station Model Town, District Rewari, Haryana (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 19.02.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 4. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 19.02.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating HITESH 2025.04.21 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-9645-2025 -2 Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 21.04.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.04.21 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh