[2025:RJ-JP:34930] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10227/2025 Sheela Pandey W/o Shri Kunwar Bahadur Pandey, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Jai Shiv Baba Ashram, Chhawani Ramchandrapura, Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/09/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.193/2023 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 177, 467, 468, 420 and 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and entire offence is based on documents which has already been recovered by the Investigating Agency. Counsel submits that after due inquiry, lease deed was issued in favour of the petitioner therefore, it cannot be said that petitioner has committed any offence. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is a female and she is in custody since 02.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:34930] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10227/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are based on documents which has already been recovered by the Investigating Agency, as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sheela Pandey W/o Shri Kunwar Bahadur Pandey shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /148