Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27427 (BOM)

BABAN MAHADU KAMBLE AND ANR v. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT COPORATION

CA/9227/2025 · 2025-08-25

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 72.CA-9227-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 72 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9227 OF 2025 IN FAST/5914/2025 BABAN MAHADU KAMBLE AND ANR VERSUS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT COPORATION ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Suryawanshi Surendra V Advocate for Respondent/Sole:Mr. D.S. Bagul … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 25.08.2025 PER COURT : . Heard both sides. 2. Applicants are claiming withdrawal of amount of Rs.4,74,759/- deposited by the Respondent/corporation. 3. The application is contested by the Respondent/corporation on the ground that there is no income proof and there are no eye- witness to the incident in question. The quantum arrived at by the tribunal is vulnerable. It is further submitted that it’s a case of contributory negligence. 4. I have gone through impugned judgment. It reveals from record that applicants are awarded amount of Rs.10,00,000/- under ‘passenger insurance scheme’. The quantum is seriously challenged 2025:BHC-AUG:23260 2 72.CA-9227-2025.doc by the Respondent/corporation. 5. I partly accept the submission of learned counsel for respondents and withhold Rs.74,759/- Ends of justice would be met in permitting the applicants to receive Rs.4,00,000/- on furnishing undertaking. 6. Civil application is partly allowed permitting the applicants to receive Rs.4,00,000/- on furnishing undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 6. Balance amount shall be invested in nationalized bank. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj..