IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) WPA 12993 of 2023 Sankar Lal Singh Versus The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors. For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumya Majumder, Mr. Pourush Bandopadhyay, Mr. Uttam Kumar Mondal, Mr. Abhidipto Tarafdar, Ms. Maitree Roy. For the KMC For the KMDA/Respondent No.8 For the Respondent No. 10 : : : Mr. Aloke Kumar Ghosh, Mr. Gopal Chandra Das. Mr. Satyajit Talukdar, Mr. Arindam Chatterjee. Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Mr. Dhilon Sengupta, Ms. Sohini Mukherjee. Hearing concluded on : 26.02.2025 Judgment on : 13.03.2025 Page 2 SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J. : 1. The present revision has been preferred praying for direction upon the respondent authorities to recall and/or withdraw the sanction plan for construction of the building with basement at 258, Vivekananda Road, Kolkata-700 006. 2. In course of hearing several reports were filed by the KMC & KMDA. A copy of the sanctioned plan is also on record. 3. A joint report dated 13.12.2024 with clarification has been filed by the KMDA and the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. The report endorsed by 4 (four) Engineers is as follows:- “Report on WPA No. 12993 of 2023 Sankar Lal Singh Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors. KMDA has conducted a thorough analysis of the pressure bulb for the proposed building (B+G+VI). The results indicate that pressure exerted from the proposed building to the bridge’s approach wall will be negligible. This analysis confirms that there will be no harmful effects on the integrity or safety of the bridge approaches due to pressure coming from the proposed building. Sd/- Sd/- 13.12.2024 13.12.2024 Executive Engineer Executive Engineer In-Charge of Assistant Engineer Kalyani Construction Division Kalyani Construction Division Roads & Bridges Sector/K.M.D.A. Roads & Bridges Sector/K.M.D.A. Page 3 Sd/- Sd/- 13.12.2024 13.12.2024 Asstt. Engineer Executive Engineer (Bldg.) Building Department Borough NO. IV & V The Kolkata Municipal Corporation Building Department Borough No. IV & V K.M.C.” 4. An exception to the said report has been filed denying the findings in the said joint report filed by the KMDA and the KMC. It is further argued by the petitioners that various agencies have given different measurement in respect of the distance between the bridge and the construction in dispute and as such the reports cannot be relied upon. 5. The joint report of the KMDA and the Kolkata Municipal Corporation dated 13.12.2024 submitted by the Engineers (4) of the KMDA and the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, categorically states that:-“This analysis confirms that there will be no harmful effects on the integrity or safety of the bridge approaches due to pressure coming from the proposed building.” 6. As such, as it is the authority concerned who has sanctioned the plan and submitted the report dated 13.12.24 which is very specific, being that “This analysis confirms that there will be no harmful effects on the integrity or safety of the bridge Page 4 approaches due to pressure coming from the proposed building.”, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the decision of the authorities concerned. 7. The writ application is dismissed. 8. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand disposed of consequently. 9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this judgment, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, expeditiously after complying with all necessary legal formalities. [Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.]