APHC010320202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 3541 PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.19611 OF 2025 Between: 1. PATHAN SAIDA BI, W/O. PATHAN KARIMASA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O 9-920, OLD MASZID BAZAR, GUTTIKONDA, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANAGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARSARAOPET. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or a Writ, more particularly a Writ in the Nature of Habeas Corpus and direct the Respondents to produce the petitioner’s husband Pathan Karimsa, S/o.Pathan Mabula, aged about 35 years, resident of RRR,J & JS,J WP No.19611/2025 2 9-920, Old Maszid Bazar, Guttikonda, Palnadu District before this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: RRR,J & JS,J WP No.19611/2025 3 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The detenue is present before this Court. The report of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Piduguralla, dated 28.07.2025, is also placed before us. In this report, it is stated that the detenue was produced before the learned Magistrate and, a statement of the detenue was also recorded. 2. The detenue, who is before us, has stated that he was called to the police station in order to pressurize him to withdraw the complaint filed by him in the year 2019. 3. The 4th respondent is personally present in Court. He strenuously denies any such attempt. 4. In view of the above developments, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO _____________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM DSH