Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2741 (RAJ)

KAILASH ALIAS KAILASHCHAND SON OF SHRI NANDLAL SAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/337/2025 · 2025-02-19

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7433] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 337/2025 Kailash Alias Kailashchand Son Of Shri Nandlal Sain, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Kuchalwada Road, P.s. Hanumannagar, District Shahpura (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Malpura) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Pareek, Mr. Aman Lodha For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. C.S. Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 392/2023 registered at Police Station Devli, District Tonk (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is a contractual dispute between the parties and entire offence is based on documents, which are in power and possession of the Investigating Agency. Petitioner is in custody since 18.12.2024. Trial of this case will take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:7433] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-337/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Kailash Alias Kailashchand Son Of Shri Nandlal Sain shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made herein above is only for just decision of the bail and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J Pcg/118