lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT.- THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PE"T!ON NO.-7894 OF 2025 `Between : Sri Adhi Srinivas @ Sreenu @ Avinash, S/o Raju, Aged 26 yrs, D.No.21- 32-30, Panja Jun., Town Kotha Road, I Town area Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner/Accused AND 1. The State ofAndhra Prades`h, Through the S.H.O., of Arilova P.S., Visakhapatnam City Rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi. 2. Mutyala Reethu, D/o Mutyala Sankar, Aged 22 yrs, C/o Hiwaga Beauty Saloon, VIP Road, 'CBM Compound , Visakhapatnam. ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 480 ;a 483 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds of criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Enlarge the petitioner on Bail in connection with the Crime No.232/2025 Arilova P.S., Visakhapatnam by Allowing the Criminal Petition; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of g'rounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R.Siva Sai Swarllp, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following; I =`-==s=!---- Dr.YLR, J CrI.P.No.7894 2025 Dt: 14.08_2O25 The Court made the following ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under SeLctions 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ithe BNSS'), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.232 of 2025 Oof Arilova Police Station, Visakhapatnam, registered against the petitioner/Accused herein for the offence punishable under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short fthe BNSj). 2. The case of the prosecution, jn brief, is that the de facfo complainant ga`ve a complaint stating that the petitioner on the pretext of love promised to marry her and they both moved closely and had sexual intercourse several times. Thereafter, the pet'ltioner/Accused refused to marry her. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned. Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. Mr.R.Siva Sai Swarup, learned counsel for the petI'tiOner Submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence; petitioner was falsely implicated by the police in the crime; petitioner would abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court; the Petitioner has got fixed abode, hence, if any condition is imposed while granting the bail, petitioner would not violate it; and it is urged to allow the petitiont 5. Percor,fro, Ms.P.Akhila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail stating that some more material witnesses have to be examined; investigation is not completed; if the petitioner was enlarged on ` -, baH he would not be aval'Iable for the jnvestlgatI'On and petltioner may threaten the w[tnesses and he would escape from the clutches of law; and I|t iS urged to dismI'SS the baI-I petition. 6. Be thatas itmay, the petltI-Onerwas arrested on ll.06.2025 and he has been in the judlcial custody for the past 70 days. Material portlon of the lnvestjgatIOn js completed. The prosecution submits that there are no adverse antecedents against the petitioner. The petitI'Oner has got flexed abodes and he I'S Permanent resident of vl-sakhapatnam. 7. consl'derlng the nature`and gravity of allegation levelled agalnst the petitl-oner, his alleged role played in this case, and the period of detention undergone by the petI-tiOner, this Court l's I'nCIined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with the following stringent condI'tjOnS.I I'. The petitioner/Accused shall be enlarged on ba" subject to them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand only), wl'th two sureties each for the like sum each to the satI'SfaCtjOn of the learned chief Judicial MagI-Strafe, VI-Sakhapatnam. ji. The petitI'Oner/Accused shall appear before the station House offI'Cer, ArI'lOVa Police station, visakhapatnam, on every saturday in between 10:00 am and o5.loo pm, tI|II cognizance Its taken by the learned the Trial Court. _ -J ``-ll-= Dr.YLR, J Crl.P.No.7894_2025 .,_.rf Dt: 14.08.2O25 I Dr.YLR, J CrI.P.No_7894 2025 Dt: 14.O8.2O25 iii. The petitioner/Accused shall not leave the limits of the District without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned. iv. The petitioner/Accused shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. v. The petitioner/Accused' shall cooperate with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall I make himself available for interrogatI-On by the investigating officer as and when required. vi. The petitioner/Accused shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. vii. The petitioner/Accused shall surrender his passport, if any, to the investigating offI'Cer. lf he Claims that he does not have a passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that effect to the Investigating Officer. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. : sE :Si:#:c:V::i`TSRA R //TRUE COPY// I For/ . a A To, 1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, vl'sakhapantam. 2. The Superintendent, central prI-SOn, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Station House officer, Arilova Police station, visakhapatnam CI.ty. 4. Mutyala Reethu, D/o Mutyala Sankar, c/o Hiwaga Beauty saloon , vlp Road, CBM Compound , visakhapatnam. (by RPAD) 5. One CC to Sri. R.Siva Sai Swarup, Advocate [opuc] 6. Two CCs to PubII'C Prosecutor,,High Court ofAP [OUT] 7. One spare copy i HIGH COURT Dr.YLR,J \ DATED:14/08/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.7894 of 2025 ALLOWED i\