[2025:RJ-JP:31934] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10218/2025 Ramesh Chand S/o Motilal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Hastganj, Police Station Chouth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur. (Presently Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Roshni Meena Mr. Ishan Mishra Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Ramesh Chand S/o Motilal in FIR No.62/2025 dated 19.02.2025 registered at P.S. Choth Ka Barwada, District–Sawai Madhopur, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 318(2), 319(2), 336(2), 303(2), 340(2) of BNS, Section 66D of IT Act and Section 13 of RPGO Act. 2. The applicant Ramesh Chand S/o Motilal was arrested on 01.08.2025 and has in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He [2025:RJ-JP:31934] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10218/2025] further submits that main accused Amit @ Chhotu, who is son of present applicant-accused, is already released on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submits that applicant is an agriculturist and his bank account is used by his son Amit @ Chhotu, who was granted bail by this Hon’ble Court. At last, he submitted that initially, the investigation was kept pending against this applicant- accused, but now he has been arrested on 01.08.2025. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. The main applicant-accused Amit @ Chhotu is released on bail by Coordinate Bench on 04.06.2025. Present applicant- accused is arrested on 01.08.2025. The Trial Court has mentioned the role and involvement of present applicant- accused. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. [2025:RJ-JP:31934] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10218/2025] The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused Ramesh Chand S/o Motilal. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Ramesh Chand S/o Motilal, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Ramesh Chand S/o Motilal, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /258