APHC010387622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ' AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO- WRIT PETITION NO: 20096 OF 2025 ^ Between: Mangali Venkamma, W/o. Late laxmanna, aged about - years, Housewife R/o. Hno 1-23, Nayakallu village, Kallur Mandal Kurnool District, Represent by her GPA Holder Sri Ashrafuddin Shaik. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land, Land administration. Govt, of AP, APIIC Building, Mangalagiri - Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondent in passing orders on the representation dated 17/07/2025 submitted to him with Mee seva online Application No. TTA012500131917 dated 09/07/2025 by the petitioner for deletion of her Agriculture Patta Land ■ adm. Ac 5-12 in Sy no 90/1 of Chetha Mallapuram Village, Kallur Mandal . - Kurnool District from Prohibitory List as illegal, arbitrary,Violation of Principles of natural Justice Violation of Article 14 and 300A of constitution of India Consequently direct the 3'"' respondent representation of petitioner hearing opportunity to the petitioner. to conduct enquiry on the & pass appropriate orders by giving personal lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'"' Respondent to dispose of the representation dated 17/07/2025 submitted by the petitioner along with Meeseva Application TA012500131917 Dated 09/07/2025 Pending Disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. ^ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. B. R. P. SEKHAR ^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010387622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20096 OF 2025 THE Between; 1. MANGALI VENKAMMA R/o. Hno 1-23, Nayakallu village, Kallur Mandal Kurnool District, Represent by her GPA Holder Sri Ashrafuddin Shaik. w/o Late laxmanna, aged about - years Housewife ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, its PrI. Secretary Revenue Dept. Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Chief Commissioner Building Mangalagiri - Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool. Secretariate, of Land, Land administration ,Govt of AP, APIIC ...Respondents under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be Petition circumstances stated in appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the representation dated. pleased topleased to issue an particularly one the part of respondent in passing orders on online Application No 17/07/2025 submitted to him with Mee seva dated 09/07/2025 by the petitioner for deletion of her TTA012500131917 2 Agriculture Patta Land adm. Ac 5-12 in Sy no 90/1 of Chetha Mallapuram Village, Kallur Mandal Kurnool District from Prohibitory List arbitrary,Violation of Principles of natural 300A of constitution of India as illegal Justice Violation of Article 14 and Consequently direct the 3RD conduct enquiry on the representation of petitioner pass a respondent to lA NO: 1 OF 2n?s Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 3RD Respondent to dispose 17/07/2025 submitted by the petitioner praying that in the circumstances stated of the representation dated along with Meeseva Application TA012500131917 Dated 09/07/2025 Pending Disposal of the Writ No Petition in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: ORDER: Pithily this writ petition is filed on the grounds that a representation was not addressed. Therefore, it is address the representation, as such made to the authorities via Meeseva, but it was urged that the respondents be directed to ; direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. in The Government of India vs P. 2. In the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in Venkatesh reported in (2019) 15 SCC 613 held that. Dispose of the representation' mantra is increasing^ Pjn'eatmg the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tnbunals^ Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposai of cases n overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, g° the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before ‘he Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated y calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute. This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities, before directing "consideration" of a ciaim or representation should examine whether live" issue or whether it is 3. the claim or representation is with reference to a stale" issue. If it is with reference to a "dead" or with reference to a "dead" or end to the matter and stale" issue or dispute, the Court/tribunal should put an reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal should not direct consideration or without itself examining the merits, it should consideration will be without prejudice to any deciding to direct "consideration make it clear that such contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect. orders directing 4. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous of representation though result in quick or easy disposal of institutions but such orders do more consideration cases in overburdened adjudicatory disservice than service to the cause of justice. 4 5. However, the respondent is directed that the petitioner's representation made through dated 17.07.2025 mee-seva online application no.TTA012500131917 dated 09.07.2025, must be considered by the respondents, examined thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision given to the petitioner. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within a period of two (02) months from the date the order is received. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTER //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The PrI. Secretary, Revenue Dept, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land, Land Administration, Govt, of 1^, APIIC Building Mangalagiri - Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnoolr^ 4. One CC to Sri Ch. B. R. P. Sekhar, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies. ssb M HIGH COURT DATED:04/08/2025 ORDER WP No.20096 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS