2025:HHC:10192 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14081 of 2024 Date of Decision: 10.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Surjeet Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Manish Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Interim order, if any, stand vacated. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 10, 2025 (Sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?