Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27377 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/4549/2025 · 2025-03-10

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35149-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4549 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Monis,Tahmina Begum Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents. 2. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the First Information Report dated 24.1.2025 registered in case Crime no. 0018 of 2025, Under Sections 85(2), 85 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023 and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Police Station-Utraon, District Ganganagar (Commissionerate Prayagraj). 3. After substantial argument, once the court has declined to quash the impugned first information report, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners do not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to invoke the remedy as available in law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioners are aggrieved, they may avail the remedy as available in law. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 11.3.2025 NLY Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad