Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27376 (JHR)

ANKITA KUMARI ALIAS ANKITA SHEKHAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6919/2024 · 2025-06-17

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:15915 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6919 of 2024 1. Ankita Kumari @ Ankita Shekhar daughter of Ajay Kumar Shekhar. 2. Barsha Kumari @ Varsha Shekhar, daughter of Ajay Kumar Shekhar 3. Rimjhim Kumari @ Rimjhim Shekhar, daughter of Ajay Kumar Shekhar 4. Kiran Shekhar @ Kiran Sekhar, wife of Ajay Kumar Shekhar 5. Dolly Shekhar, wife of Manjay Kumar Shekhar. 6. Babu Shekhar @ Ansh Kumar Shekhar, son of Ajay Kumar Shekhar All are residents of village Mahal, P.O Mahal, P.S. Chandankiyari, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. . ...... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. B. Shastri, A.P.P …..... 05/17.06.2025: This anticipatory bail application under Section(s) 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Section(s) 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 308(3), 308(4), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 in connection with Chandankiyari (Amlabad O.P.) P.S. Case No. 148 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro. Heard the parties at length and had gone through the documents, annexed along with this application. Learned A.P.P after going through the case diary and record, submits that in the supervision, the police did not find any material against petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. So far as petitioner Nos. 3 to 6 are concerned, he submits that the allegations are found to be true under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, but as per him all the Sections are bailable in nature. He lastly submits that in view of the aforesaid fact, this anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Since during investigation, no material has been found against petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and the offences against rest of the petitioners are found to be bailable in nature, I direct the petitioners to appear before the Court concerned. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of. Anu/-C.P.-3 (ANANDA SEN, J.)