APHC010387962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19607/2025 Between: 1. YANGANNAGARI VENKATARAMANA, S/O.LATE Y.RAGHAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R./O.15-10, BADAGANAPALLE, KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE VILLAGE, YERRAVARIPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517194 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRICIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING,SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DITRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YERRAVARIPALEM P.S, YERRAVARIPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. Y RAJESWARAMMA, W/O Y.SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.BADAGANAPALLI, KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE, THATIMAKULA (PO), YERRAVARIPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517194. 5. Y MANJULA, W/O Y.MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O BADAGANAPALLI, KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE,TBATIMAKULA (PO), YERRAVARIPALEMMANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517194. 6. CHARAN KUMAR, S/O.Y.MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.BADAGANAPALLI, KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE,THATIMAKULA (PO), YERRAVARIPALEMMANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517194 7. Y.SIVA PRASAD, S/O.Y.MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O.BADAGANAPALLI, KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE,THATIMAKULA (PO), YERRAVARIPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517194. 8. GURAPPAGARI CHANDRA BABU, S/O GURU SWAMMY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.BADAGANAPALLI, 2 KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE,THATIMAKULA (PO), YERRAVARIPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517194. 9. GURAPPAGARI SUBRAMANYAM, S/O.GURU SWAMMY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.BADAGANAPALLI, KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE, THATIMAKULA (PO), YERRAVARIPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517194. 10. GURAPPAGARI GURU PRASAD, S/O.DANAJAYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.BADAGANAPALLI, KAMALAYYAGARIPALLE, THATIMAKULA (PO), YERRAVARIPALEM MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-517194. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2nd and 3rd in not registering the FIR, Pursuant to the Petitioner Complaint dated 16.07.2025 to the 3rd Respondent and dated24.07.2025 to the 2nd respondent therein in relation to the illegal obstruction and threats caused by Respondents 4 to 10, as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct Respondent No. 2nd and 3rd to forthwith remove the illegal fencing and obstruction caused by Respondent No.4 to 10 on the cement road leading to the Petitioner's house and to restore free and safe access to the Petitioner and his family and Direct Respondent No.2nd and 3rd to take appropriate legal action against Respondents 4 to 10 in accordance with law based on the Petitioners complaint and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PASAPALA SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: 3 “ .... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2nd and 3rd in not registering the FIR, Pursuant to the Petitioner Complaint dated 16.07.2025 to the 3rd Respondent and dated 24.07.2025 to the 2nd respondent therein in relation to the illegal obstruction and threats caused by Respondents 4 to 10, as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith remove the illegal fencing and obstruction caused by Respondent Nos.4 to 10 on the cement road leading to the Petitioner's house and to restore free and safe access to the Petitioner and his family and Direct Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take appropriate legal action against Respondents 4 to 10 in accordance with law based on the Petitioners complaint and to pass ....” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions dated 31.07.2025 would submit that based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, respondent Police removed the fencing on the cement road leading to the house of the Petitioner and that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19607 of 2025 07.08.2025 Mjl /*