[2025:RJ-JP:34072] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12616/2025 Ram Prasad Keer Son Of Late Shri Polu Keer, Aged About 56 Years, Ex-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat - Ajgara, Panchayat Samiti - Arain District Ajmer Presently Residing At Village Heengtara, Gram Panchayat - Bhatolao, Panchayat Samiti - Sarwar, Tehsil - Sarwar, District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary To The Government, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayatiraj Secretariat, Jaipur - 302001. 2. The Sub-Division Officer, Sarwar, (District Ajmer). 3. The Block Development Officer (Vikas Adhikari), Panchayat Samiti - Sarwar, Sarwar, District Ajmer. 4. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat - Bhatolao, Panchayat Samiti - Sarwar, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kishore Saksena JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/08/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned notice dated 28.07.2025 issued by Gram Panchayat, Bhatolav, Panchayat Samiti, Sarvad, District Ajmer by which the petitioner has been called upon to vacate the possession over the subject land. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in occupation of the subject land on the basis of the patta issued by the Panchayat and he has not raised any unauthorized [2025:RJ-JP:34072] (2 of 2) [CW-12616/2025] construction over the same, even then a vague notice has been issued to the petitioner that he has encroached upon the land of Community Hall. Learned counsel submits that a detailed reply to the aforesaid notice has been submitted along-with copy of the notice, even then the respondents have issued one more notice to the petitioner on 12.08.2025 asking the petitioner to submit original patta. Learned counsel submits that, in response to the subsequent notice also, the requisite documents have been submitted even then the respondents are bent upon to dispossess the petitioner. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the matter is required to be examined by the respondents on the basis of the detailed reply submitted by the petitioner along-with documents upon which he is placing reliance. It is expected from the respondents to pass reasoned and speaking order after providing due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of five weeks from today. 4. For a period of five weeks, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. 6. Needless to observe, in case, any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he would be at liberty to approach appropriate forum of law for redressal of his grievances. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/53