1 2025:CGHC:37216-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1560 of 2023 1. Urmila Soni W/o Nandkishore Soni Aged About 62 Years R/o - Nawatoli, Police Station - Jashpur, District - Jashpur, C.G. 2. Kanchan Soni D/o Nandkishor Soni Aged About 31 Years R/o - Nawatoli, Police Station - Jashpur, District - Jashpur, C.G. 3. Prakash Soni S/o Nandkishore Soni Aged About 38 Years R/o - Nawatoli, Police Station - Jashpur, District - Jashpur, C.G. 4. Pooja Soni D/o Nandkishore Soni Aged About 36 Years R/o - Nawatoli, Police Station - Jashpur, District - Jashpur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station - Jashpur, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Shakuntala Soni W/o Jugalkishore Soni Aged About 60 Years R/o - Ward No. 2, Nawatoli, Police Station - Jashpur, District - Jashpur, C.G. ...Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Saxena, Advocate. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.07.30 18:20:26 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 30.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Deepak Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No. 1/State and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Saxena, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the impugned FIR No. 228 of 2022 registered at Police Station Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 34 of Indian Penal Code and entire criminal proceedings pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jashpur in Criminal Case No. 1054 of 2022 against the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the present CRMP has been filed for quashing of the FIR, charge-sheet and entire criminal proceeding, but in the present case, charges had already been framed by the learned trial Court against the petitioners, therefore, he prays that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to challenge the same. 3 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan