Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2737 (GAU)

GUNENDRA KUMAR NATH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/3113/2025 · 2026-02-05

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010188392025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/3113/2025 GUNENDRA KUMAR NATH SON OF BHABIRAM NATH VILL- DOSOTANI P.O. GARUKHUTI DOSTANY SIPAJHAR DARRANG ASSAM PIN-784145. 2: JULHAS ALI S/OLATE NAUSAD ALI R/O G.K. PWD ROAD NEAR SANOWA BAR BASJID SANOWATARI SIPAJHAR DARRANG ASSAM PIN-784145 3: KHORSED ALI S/O LATIF ALI R/O SANOWATARI DARRANG ASSAM PIN-784145 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22. 3:THE ZONAL JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES TEZPUR ZONE DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784001. 4:THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MANGALDAI DIST. DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 784125. 5:THE SENIOR INSPECTOR CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT MANGALDAI SUB-DIVISION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DIST. DARRANG ASSAM PIN-784125. 6:THE SECRETARY OF KURUA G.P. SAMABAI SAMITTEE LIMITED VILL AND P.O. SANOWA DIST. DARRANG ASSAM PIN- 784145. 7:THE KARUA G.P. SAMABAI SAMITTEE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN NAMELY MD. MOINUL HOQUE VILL- AND P.O. SANOWA DIST. DARRANG ASSAM PIN-784145 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A MANNAF Advocate for : SC CO OP appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 06.02.2026 This interlocutory application has been filed to implead Md. Moinul Hoque, the Chairman of Kurua Gaon Panchayat Samabai Samittee Limited as party respondent no.8 in WP(C) No.5018/2025. According to the learned counsel for the applicants, the said opposite party would be necessary to be impleaded as party respondent no.8 in WP(C) No.5018/2025. However, upon perusal of the cause title, it appears that the parties proposed to be arrayed as the respondent no.8 has not been arrayed as opposite party and as a consequence thereof it is not possible to issue notices upon the opposite party no.8. Upon the pointed query made by the Court, learned counsel for the applicants submits, he would not like to press this application as the respondent no.7, namely, the Kurua GP Samabai Samittee Limited to which Md. Moinul Hoque is the Chairman has already been arrayed as party respondent no.7 and the respondent no.7 is represented by Dr. R Sarma, learned counsel. In view of the above, this Interlocutory Application stands dismissed as Page No.# 4/4 not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant