1 2025:CGHC:4770 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 384 of 2023 Rakesh Kumar Sinha S/o Shri Jhumuk Lal Sinha Aged About 33 Years Working As A Rural Health Organiser At Sub Health Centre, Charbhata, Block Dongargarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Director Directorate Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Block No. 01 Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Sultana Begum, Rural Health Organiser Women, Sub Health Centre Singhola, Block Ghumka, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Shri B.P. Singh and Shri Shikhar Bakhtiyar, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 3/State. : Shri Saumitra Kesharwani, PL. For respondent No.4 : Shri Aditya Bharadwaj, Advocate. GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2025.02.03 11:53:24 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 27/01/2025 1. Heard Shri B.P. Singh and Shri Shikhar Bakhtiyar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Saumitra Kesharwani, learned Panel Lawyer for the State and Shri Aditya Bharadwaj, learned counsel for respondent No.4. 2. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- “(i)That this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order dated 08/12/2022. (ii)That any other relief which this Court deems fit and proper may also be granted in favour of the petitioner safeguarding his interest.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though he is having valid grounds to challenge the impugned order (Annexure P-1), however since the private respondent No.4 has already completed training as Ophthalmic Assistant, as such at present he is not challenging the said order. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the month of March a new list is coming and the petitioner is entitled to go for training as Ophthalmic Assistant in all respect. He would submit that considering the aspect that the petitioner has already challenged the previous order in which he was having entitlement to go for the training, however as the reply was not filed within time, this petition has become infructuous, as such the respondents may be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner in the forth coming training programme. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law 3 and if the petitioner is found fit in all respect, his candidature may be considered in accordance with law. 5. With such observation, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge gouri