IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 629 OF 2016 Appeal filed under 96 of CPC., aggrieved by the Judgment and decree in O.S.No. 293 of 2011 on the file of VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, dated 30-10-2015. Between: 1. Smt. Achanta Pavani, W/o A.Gopichand, aged about 37 years, R/o Villa No. 25, Aparna Archids, Near Hitex, Izzath Nagar, Kondapur, Hyderabad 2. Koneru Siva Nageswara Rao, S/o late Koneru Venkateswara Rao, Aged 65 years, R/o. D.No. 57-3-1, Yedavula Bazar, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Appellants/Defendants 1 and 3 AND 1. Devineni Kasi Basava Annapurnamma, W/o D.Mallikarjuna Rao, aged 64 years, R/o. D.No. 8-3-226 & 227/A, Flat No. 303, Sairam Gardens Deluxe, Yousafguda, Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Plalntiff r 2. Koneru Vamsi Krishna, S/o Ramesh Babu, Aged about 32 years, R/o. D.No. 57-2-7/1, Karnam Gari Bazar, Patamata, Vijayawa, Krishna i; - District. Koneru Ramesh Babu, S/o late K.Venkateswara Rao, D.No. 57-2-7/1, . Karnam Gari Bazar, Patamata, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Respondents/Defendants 2 & 4 Counsel for the Appellants: Sri Krupachand Gogineni Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri K. V. Raghu Veer Counsel for other Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: f' • APHC010387442016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) 3494 TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE SIpresent THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM APPEAL SUIT No.629 OF 2016 Between: Achanta Pavani and another Appellants and Devineni Kasi Basava Annapurnamma and 2 others Respondent Counsel for the Appellants Sri Krupachand Gogineni Counsel for the Respondent Sri K.V. Raghu Veer The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (Per njs,j) In view of the disposal of the connected matter i.e., Appeal Suit No.336 of 2016, in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Appeal. Permission, as sought for, is granted. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 2 NJS,J & JS,J AS No.629/2016 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional District Civil Judge, Vijayawada Krishna District. 2. The VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. One CC to Sri Krupachand Gogineni Advocate 4. One CC to Sri K. V. Raghu Veer Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra 6. Three CD Copies [OPUC] Pradesh. SAM Cnr HIGH COURT SAM DATED:25/02/2025 JUDGMENT AS.No.629 of 2016 f 2« mar 2025 "a Current iiacnon . DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN