239 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA LOVEDEEP HANDA AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. for the petitioner Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondent HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.62 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act (Section 326 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of affidavit/compromise deed dated 10.02.2025 (Ann 2. The following order was passed on IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LOVEDEEP HANDA AND OTHERS V/S PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Kamal Narula, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.62 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections /27/54/59 of Arms Act (Section 326 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of affidavit/compromise deed dated 10.02.2025 (Ann The following order was passed on “This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.62 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act (Section 326 of IPC added later on) Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9741-2025 Date of decision: 21.03.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.62 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections /27/54/59 of Arms Act (Section 326 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of affidavit/compromise deed dated 10.02.2025 (Annexure P-2). The following order was passed on 20.02.2025 :- This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.62 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act (Section 326 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P-1) along MANISHA 2025.03.21 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-9741-2025 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act 2025 2 with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of affidavit/compromise deed dated 10.02.2025 (Annexure P Notice of motion for 21.03.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.2 & 3 and files his vakalatnama and admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date conv Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to in proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and FIR No.62 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of affidavit/compromise deed dated 10.02.2025 (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion for 21.03.2025. tage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent State and Mr. Ranjodh Singh Sidhu, Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.2 & 3 and files his vakalatnama and admits to mpromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition FIR No.62 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 452/324/323/336/148/149 of IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act MANISHA 2025.03.21 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-9741-2025 (Section 326 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioner March 21, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 2025 3 (Section 326 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, Punjab (Annexure P-1) and all arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioner (HARPREET SINGH BRAR 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable (Section 326 of IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Mamdot, and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.03.21 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment