Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27358 (JHR)

SPEEDO PRINT THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE NAMELY NEMI CHAND AGRAWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/5990/2024 · 2025-04-03

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:10369-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5990 of 2024 Speedo Print, a Proprietorship firm, having its office and works at Industrial Area, Kokar (near Prabhat khabar), P.O and P.S: Sadar, District: Ranchi Proprietor namely Suchitra Agrawal, aged about 61 years, wife of Nemi Chand Agrawal, resident of 1A, Exotica Apartment, Near Gandhi Nagar, P.O and P.S: Gonda, Kanke Road, Kanke, Ranchi through its authorised representative namely Nemi Chand Agrawal, aged about 64 years son of late Ram Niranjan Agrawal, resident of 1A, Exotica Apartment, Near Gandhi Nagar, P.O and P.S: Gonda, Kanke Road, Kanke, Ranchi. ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Principal Secretary, Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Nepal House, P.O and P.S: Doranda, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Jharkhand Rural Health Mission Society, through its Incharge, Procurement Cell, Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Namkum, P.O. and P.S: Namkum, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Administrative Officer cum Incharge, Procurement Cell, Jharkhand Rural Health Mission Society, Health, Medical Education and family welfare department, Namkum, P.O and P.S: Namkum, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Mission Director, Jharkhand Rural Health Mission Society, Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Namkum, P.O and P.S: Namkum, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. National Health Mission, through its Procurement Koshang Incharge, Jharkhand Office having its office at Project Bhawan P.O and P.S: Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Pasari, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. --------- 04/Dated: 03.04.2025 1. It is stated by counsel on both sides that the writ petition has become infructuous since the subject tender has since been withdrawn on 05.03.2025. 2. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2