SANDIP KRUSHNA BAVASKAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
WP/1159/2016 · 2025-09-11
Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27349 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27349 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1159.16crwp (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1159 OF 2016 SANDIP KRUSHNA BAVASKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ….. Mr S. D. Nimbalkar, Advocate h/f Mr D. P. Palodkar, Advocate for Petitioners Mr D. B. Bhange, APP for Respondent No.1/State Ms S. L. Awchar, Advocate (appointed) for Respondent No.2 …..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 11 SEPTEMBER 2025 P. C. :
1. Ms Awchar, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 states that R.C.C. No.76/2016 pending before the learned J.M.F.C., Sillod, Dist. Aurangabad has already been disposed of. Copy of the said order is produced on record before the Court, which is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
2. Since the proceedings before the learned J.M.F.C. itself is
disposed of, present petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of as infructuous. 2025:BHC-AUG:24341
1159.16crwp (2)
4. Fees of learned Advocate appointed to represent respondent No.2 is to be paid through the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad as per Rules.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk