APHC010387082018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 18171/2018 Between: M/s. Sri Sree Balaji Rice Mill, and Others AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALAMATA R BABU(SC AP CIVIL SUPPL 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “…issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of action of the respondents No of the custom milling custom milling rice on the alleged ground that he has stored a IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 18171/2018 M/s. Sri Sree Balaji Rice Mill, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) f Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): KALAMATA R BABU(SC AP CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPN) GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 to 5 in seizure of 4262.69 MTs illing paddy and a quantity of 77.50 quintal of ice on the alleged ground that he has stored a IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue appropriate writ order or direction more andamus declaring the 69 MTs 50 quintal of ice on the alleged ground that he has stored a 2 W.P.No.18171 of 2018 quantity of 77.50 quintals in the petitioner No.1 rice mill through the seizure panchanama, dated 15.05.2018 even after recording that the entries stock register being maintained by the petitioner relating to the custom milling paddy and the stock available in the petitioner No.1 is tallying with the records available with the respondent No.5 as arbitrary, illegal and colorable exercise of power apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside seizure panchanama dated 15.05.2018 and to pass such other order or orders…..” 2. Sri D.Dorababu, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the writ petitioner stated that no further order is required. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the respondents is present. 4. In view of the representation, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 12.02.2025 GRL 3 W.P.No.18171 of 2018 216 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 18171 of 2018 Date: 12.02.2025 GRL