Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 454/2017
Mohd. Israil …. Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Hardesh Kumar, Secy. G.A.D and Anr. ….Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA for R-2.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
01.01.2025.
The record reveals that for the last three consecutive dates of hearings, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and same is the position today as well.
Mr. Suneel Malhotra, learned GA submits that even otherwise the order which is sought to be complied with stands complied with in its letter and spirit and this is precisely the reason that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and, accordingly, no fruitful purpose will be served to keep this contempt petition pending and, accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition stands closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu: 01.01.2025 Neha-1
Sr.No. 06 Neha Kumari 2025.01.01 19:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document