Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27335 (KAR)

BYRAGONDA SIDDALINGANNA SILPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5895/2024 · 2025-02-11

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6006 CRL.P No. 5895 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5895 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. BYRAGONDA SIDDALINGANNA SILPA @ SILPA B.S., W/O. DILIP KUMAR, VALASA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. 2. VALASA RAJASHEKAR SIRI W/O PREMANATHA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. 3. V.S.N. PRATHAP REDDY @ V S NAGA PRATHAP REDDY, S/O LATE V N SADASIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 4. DILIP KUMAR VALASA S/O LATE V.N. SADASIVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO.23, 6TH CROSS, SWARNALATHA MANSION, DEVASANDRA MAIN ROAD, KR PURAM, BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ABHISHEK N V., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6006 CRL.P No. 5895 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY K.R. PURAM POLICE STATION, BENGALURU URBAN - 560 036, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. GUTIPALLI SREEDHAR S/O G. KISHORE BABU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO.LIG 399, LIG BUS STOP, ANANTHAPURAM ANDHRA PRADESH - 515 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL.SPP FOR R1; SRI. SUNIL KUMAR S., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.2654/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE III ACMM, BENGALURU AT ANNEXURE D, REGISTERED AS PER THE FIR LODGED BY K.R.PURAM POLICE STATION, BENGALURU IN CR.NO.304/2020 FOR OFFENCE P/US/ 403,409,420,421,464,477-A R/W SEC.34 OF IPC WHEREIN THE PETITIONER ARE ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6006 CRL.P No. 5895 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: "The petitioners most humbly submits as follows: That the petitioners and the respondent No.2 during the pendency of the above petition have arrived at a proposed settlement and the parties are interested in settling the pending dispute." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE JJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 34 CT:SNN