[2025:RJ-JP:32892] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10179/2025 Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Kanwar S/o Beelaram, R/o Kanwarbas, Tan Chorwada, P.S. Bandikui, District Dausa (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Bandikui). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10603/2025 Manish Kumar S/o Shri Surgyan, R/o Aadya Ki Dhani Sodala, Police Station Bandikui District Dausa (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena, Adv., with Mr. Naresh Kumar Meena, Adv., and Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/08/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.276/2025 registered at Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 351(3), 352 & 189(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25 & 27 of Arms Act. [2025:RJ-JP:32892] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10179/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that it is a case of no injury as no person of the complainant party has sustained any injury. They further submit that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. They contend that the petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that it is a case of no injury; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Kanwar S/o Beelaram and 2. Manish Kumar S/o Shri Surgyan shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they [2025:RJ-JP:32892] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10179/2025] shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made herein above is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-320-321