SATISH URF LEELU S/O SHRI SATYAPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1087/2025 · 2025-08-13
Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27332 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27332 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31447-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1087/2025 Satish Urf Leelu S/o Shri Satyapal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sherpur, Police Station Behror, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Open Air Camp Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Prisoners Parole Advisory Committee, (State Committee) Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan.
3. Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG, with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order 13/08/2025
1. This petition is filed seeking regular parole.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted the application for release on regular parole before the appropriate authority. However, his application has yet not been decided and is still pending. Therefore, counsel for the petitioner has made a limited prayer to direct the appropriate authority to decide the application of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.
[2025:RJ-JP:31447-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1087/2025]
3. This petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction that the parole application of the petitioner shall be decided within three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law if aggrieved of the decision.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DANISH USMANI /39