< -_ r= lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .-PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7862 OF 2025 Betwee n : Mr. Vallabhneni Vamsi Mohan, S/o. Sri Ramesh Chand, Age 53 years, Occ. Former MLA, R/o. Pent House, R.S. Kalyani Towers, Opp. St. Johns SchoolJ Srinagar, Gannavaram. ...PetitI-Oner/A2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, At Amaravati. Through The Stattion House Officer, Hanuman Junction Police Station, Krishna DistrI'Ct,- ..IRespondent Petition under section 483(1) of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax the conditions imposed by the Court of the xv AddI. District and Sessions Judge at Nuzvid', while granting Bail in CrI.M.P.NO.454 /2025 vide orders Dt.01.07.2025 in the interest of justice. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of grollnds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the{ arguments of M/s V.Devi Satya Sri, Advocate for the petitioner, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the court made the following -E JCO10386492025 FTRET lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original .Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CR[M[NAL PETITION NO: 7862/2025 Between : Vallabhneni Vamsi Mohan The State of Andhra Pradesh AND [3521] .mPETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: V. Devi Satya Sri' Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. The petitioner sought relaxation of the condition imposed by the learned XV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nuzvid, in CrI.M.P.No.454 of 2019 in Crime No.208 6f 2025 of Hanuman Junction Police Station (C.C.No.253 of 2024), while granting bail to the petitioner. As per the said condition, the petitioner was directed to appear before the Investigating Officer twice a week, i.e., every Wednesday and Saturday, between 10:00 A.M. and 12:00 Noon, for 2 Crl.P.No.7862 o` Dated 20.08.2\ 3. The learned publI-C Prosecutor submits that the investigation is not yet completed, as certain documents are required to be sent to the FSL, for which an application has been filed before the learned Trial Court, in which the Petitioner iS expected tO file his counter. Hence, the learned public Prosecutor opposed the Present aPPll-CatiOn On the ground that the investigation is still pending- 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the health condition of the petI-tiOner does not Permit him to appear before the Investigating officer twice a week, as the petI`tiOner requires surgery to his nose 5. ConsiderI|ng the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the view that balancing of equity is required to be maintained between the parties. lf the conditI-On iS SIightly relaxed by directing the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer once a week, i.e., on every saturday between 10:00 A.M. and 5.loo P.M., it would meet the ends of justice. Accordingly, the condI-lion I-mPOSed earlier is r.elaxed. The criminal petition is partly allowed, relaxing the condition and dI-reCting the petitioner to appear before the station House Officer once a week, i.e., on every saturday between 10:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., for a period of three months or until filing of the charge sheet, whichever is earlier. AS` sD:-I SK+£RNJTffiEAa3 RAJ U TP.AR To, 1. The XV Additional Dis{ric{ and Sessions Judge at Nuzvid, Krishna District 2. The Station House Offl-cer, Hanuman Junction Police Station, Krishna District 3. One CC to M/s V.DevI| Satya Sri Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. One spare copy PSR. P HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATED:20/08/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.7862 of 2025 PARTLY ALLOWED