Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27325 (GAU)

Gida Maya v. The State of AP and Anr

IA(Crl)/89/2025 · 2025-08-28

Anjan Moni Kalita

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040014572025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/89/2025 Gida Maya Age: 37 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Gida Tachik permanent resident of Yupia-III PO and PS Doimukh Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and Anr Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the PP of AP 2:Smti Yaper Markia Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Daughter of Late Tara Ebiya resident of Niti Vihar Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : J Tsering, Licha Teni,Techi Topu,Gotu Riba Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 29.08.2025 Heard Mr. J. Tsering, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. The instant interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner, praying for suspension of sentences and granting of bail, during the pendency of criminal revision petition against the judgement and order dated 26.08.2025, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Yupia, in Criminal Appeal No. 10/2025 as well as the impugned sentence order dated 08.08.2025, pronounced by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Papum Pare District, Yupia, in G. R. Case No. 06/2015, convicting the accused Shri Gida Maya under Section 420 IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6(six) months and payment of find of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh) only and in default of payment of fine, the accused shall further undergo 2(two) months of simple imprisonment. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the petitioner is presently on bail on the strength of the order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yupia, Distrct Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh, dated 08.08.2025. Therefore, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant may be allowed to stay on bail till the disposal of the connected criminal revision petition. I have heard the parties and considered the materials on record. Page No.# 3/3 The order dated 26.08.2025, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Yupia as well as the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yupia, is hereby suspended. The instant interlocutory application stands disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant