Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010229562025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6037/2025 SRI BISHNU RAM HANSE @ BISHNU HANSE S/O- LATE JANGPHONG HANSE @ JANGPHONG, RESIDENT OF- VILL- BAKALIAGHAT, BAHONI ADARSHA, P.O. - BOKOLIA, P.S.-BOKOLIA, DISTRICT- KARBI- ANGLONG, ASSAM. PIN NO.782482. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HILLS AREA DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN NO.- 781006. 3:THE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL (KAAC) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DIPHU DISTRICT- KARBI-ANGLONG ASSAM PIN NO. -782460. 4:THE JOINT SECRETARY KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR LAND ACQUISITION) DIPHU DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN NO.-782460. 5:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE DIPHU DISTRICT - KARBI-ANGLONG ASSAM PIN NO.-782460. 6:THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER (ARO)/ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER (ASO) PHULONI REVENUE CIRCLE AT PHULONI DISTRICT-KARBI-ANGLONG ASSAM PIN NO.- 782441. 7:THE GENERAL MANAGER NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (NHIDCL) PMU- JORHAT ASSAM PIN NO-785001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N K MURRY, S DEB,MS S.DAS,MS N NEWME,MS P TOKBIPI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, REVENUE,SC, NHIDC,GA, ASSAM,SC, K A A C BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 27-10-2025 Heard Mr. N.K. Murry, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. A. Sharma, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent no. 1; Mr. J. Handique, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 2; Mr. K. Chutia, learned Standing Counsel, Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council for the Page No.# 3/3 respondent nos. 3, 4, 5 & 6; and Mr. R. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, NHIDCL for the respondent no. 7. Mr. Murry, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that certain facts which have been omitted, are required to be brought on record. He has submitted that in such view of the matter, the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. As the submission of the learned for the petitioner is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, the prayer is allowed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant